St Chrysostom's CofE Primary School Ofsted Report

Full inspection result: Good

Back to St Chrysostom's CofE Primary School

Full report

What does the school need to do to improve further?

  • Continue to improve teaching and raise pupils’ achievement in reading, writing and mathematics by:
    • teaching reading comprehension skills explicitly and evaluating the impact of strategies that have been recently introduced
    • ensuring that pupils, particularly the most able, are supported to develop reasoning skills, apply their knowledge to solve problems and deepen their learning in mathematics
    • giving pupils opportunities to write at length
    • further developing pupils’ vocabulary and spelling skills.
  • Develop subject leaders’ skills to enable them to lead improvements to teaching and check that pupils’ knowledge and skills are developing systematically.
  • Ensure that children in the early years, particularly able children who do not yet speak English, make the best possible progress in all areas of learning by:
    • ensuring that assessments accurately reflect children’s ability in mathematical understanding, knowledge of the world and their personal and social skills
    • ensuring that activities in mathematics are sufficiently challenging to enable children to extend their learning.

Inspection judgements

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

Governance of the school

  • The governing body provides good support for school leaders and checks the performance of the school closely. Governors are managing the move from two governing bodies to one federated governing body effectively.
  • The chair of the school governing body has an in-depth understanding of the school’s performance based on a good understanding of data and comprehensive reports from the local authority.
  • Governors ensure that pupil premium funding is used effectively. Disadvantaged pupils of all abilities make good progress because they benefit from additional support, good-quality resources and access to a range of enrichment activities.
  • Governors oversee leaders’ performance and teachers’ performance management effectively.

Safeguarding

  • The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
  • There are thorough procedures to ensure the safe recruitment of staff and ensure that governors and all who work with pupils in school have the relevant checks.
  • Records relating to safeguarding are detailed and well organised. Pupils whose circumstances may make them vulnerable are supported very effectively, with support from outside agencies where appropriate.
  • All staff have completed training in safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty appropriate to their roles and responsibilities. They receive frequent updates and all have read the most recent government guidelines. Staff are aware of the signs of abuse and risks associated with extremism; they know the routes to follow if they have any concerns.
  • There are appropriate filters in place to ensure the safety of pupils when they are online.
  • All parents who responded to Parent View said their child feels happy and safe.

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

Personal development and welfare

  • The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is outstanding.
  • Pupils’ personal development and welfare is at the heart of everything the school does. Pupils grow in confidence and are extremely well prepared for life in modern society.
  • The school is a welcoming and harmonious community where everyone gets on well. Staff are excellent role models in promoting positive and caring relationships. Pupils show great respect for each other and celebrate the diversity within their school enthusiastically.
  • Pupils and staff ensure that pupils who join the school during the school year are helped to settle in quickly. Older pupils who have limited experience of English or the national curriculum are provided with excellent support to help them catch up and learn English.
  • Pupils are encouraged to contribute to decision-making and the running of their school at every opportunity. For example, they talked about the qualities they would like in their new executive headteacher and a representative group interviewed candidates, asking very challenging questions.
  • Pupils’ leadership skills are developed exceptionally well. The school council and pupil leadership groups, such as the Champions of Worship, rightly take great pride in their work. The school councillors ensure that they represent the views of their classmates. The school grounds have been developed as a result of their most recent project and the garden is enjoyed by all.
  • Pupils feel and are safe in school. They have an in-depth understanding of risks and hazards that could compromise their safety in school and beyond, including when they are online. Pupils know who to talk to and what to do if they ever feel at risk or concerned.
  • Pupils who spoke with inspectors were positive that bullying does not happen in their school. They have a good understanding of different types of bullying, including that associated with racism, extremism and homophobia. They know that such bullying will not be tolerated in school.
  • All parents who made their views known feel their children are happy and safe. The vast majority feel bullying is dealt with effectively.

Behaviour

  • The behaviour of pupils is good.
  • Pupils’ attendance is above average and they are punctual to school.
  • Fixed-term exclusions have been reduced significantly from above average in 2014 to nil in 2015. This is because behaviour is being managed more effectively by all staff and pupils who initially struggle to manage their own behaviour are provided with excellent support to ensure that they remain engaged in school. No pupils have been permanently excluded during the last three years.
  • Behaviour around the school and in shared areas is exemplary. Pupils are polite, considerate and sensible.
  • Pupils have positive attitudes to learning and the vast majority concentrate in lessons and produce good-quality work. Occasionally a few pupils wander off task and may temporarily disrupt the learning of others in lessons. Teachers and teaching assistants are quick to recognise where this happens and provide appropriate support. A few pupils do not look after their books well.

Outcomes for pupils

Good

achievement at key stage 2, that has been evident for the last two years, has been halted. The disruption to leadership and staffing, including several interim appointments and temporary teaching staff, contributed to this decline. Staffing and leadership are now stabilised and new teachers and leaders are raising pupils’ achievement.

  • Pupils have made consistently make good progress from their starting points and attained above-average standards at the end Year 2 over a number of years. This strong performance is continuing and current pupils are achieving at least expected standards in reading, writing and mathematics in each class at key stage 1. Attainment in the phonics screening check also remains above average.
  • The low attainment at the end of key stage 2 in reading in 2016 was due partly to the high number of pupils in that cohort who joined the school in key stage 2. Leaders recognise that past pupils have not received explicit enough teaching in comprehension skills to help them understand deeper meaning in texts. For some, limited English and lack of understanding of vocabulary was a barrier. Teaching is now securing better progress in reading.
  • The most able pupils read with fluency and understanding and have a good range of strategies to work out unknown words. The least able pupils are more reliant on phonic strategies and work out the pronunciation of words accurately. However, they do not have the fluency to infer meaning from the text.
  • In mathematics, pupils typically attain at expected standards at the end of key stage 2 and lower- and middle-ability pupils have made good progress in the past. The most able pupils have not made such good progress however, considering their prior attainment at key stage 1.
  • Disadvantaged pupils are supported effectively and make at least as good and sometimes better progress than other pupils in school with the same starting points. In 2016 disadvantaged pupils made similar or better progress than other pupils nationally in writing and mathematics. Progress in reading was not as positive and reflected that of other pupils in school.
  • Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress over time. They benefit from targeted support in class and additional help from specialist support staff in small groups. The support in early years and at key stage 1 is particularly effective. Pupils who need to catch up are also supported well so they make accelerated progress.
  • Pupils who speak English as an additional language are supported well across key stage 1 and key stage 2. Those who are at early stages of English-language acquisition are given effective support to develop their language skills in subjects across the curriculum.
  • The most able pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, make good progress in writing across the school and in all subjects at key stage 1. They do not make such good progress in mathematics at key stage 2 because activities are at times too repetitive and do not provide them with sufficient opportunities to develop reasoning and problem-solving skills. Pupils of all abilities, including the most able, have not made expected progress in reading in the last two years.

Early years provision Good

  • Children enter the early years with a wide range of pre-school experiences. Many children do not speak English so their communication, language and literacy skills in English are often below that which is typical for their age. Their knowledge and skills in other areas of learning are more varied and cohorts vary from year to year.
  • Children make good progress from their starting points and the proportion reaching a good level of development is typically in line with the national average. Children make rapid gains in their communication, language and literacy skills. They are prepared well for further learning in Year 1.
  • The early years provision is well led by an assistant headteacher. New staff are inducted well and all receive appropriate training to develop their skills and ensure that they are up to date with school policies and safeguarding procedures.
  • The learning environment is stimulating and well organised to promote imaginative play and provide children with purposeful activities across all areas of learning. The outdoor area is well resourced and provides an exciting outdoor classroom. Children enjoy exploring natural materials and developing their skills across all areas.
  • The curriculum is broad and balanced and teaching is consistently good. Children are motivated and delight in exploring the range of activities. In the Nursery, for example, children developed their manual dexterity by managing utensils to create models, using tweezers to pick up buttons and using writing and painting materials to make marks.
  • The teaching of phonics is a strength. Children in the Reception classes are grouped appropriately and build on their skills systematically. The multi-sensory approach ensures that they develop effective early reading and writing skills.
  • There is excellent provision for children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities in the early years. Children make great strides in their learning in structured sessions with a speech and language specialist. Adults work together consistently to support children’s learning and personal development in a range of contexts.
  • Staff make good use of additional funding and make sure that disadvantaged children make just as good progress as others.
  • Teaching assistants make a good contribution to children’s learning and are consistent in all their dealings with children. They are particularly skilled in supporting children’s language and literacy development.
  • Children are very well behaved and develop good attitudes to learning at an early stage. They work and play together happily. Children feel safe, develop independence in learning and grow in confidence because adults are encouraging and provide an excellent level of care for children.
  • Staff are vigilant in ensuring children’s safety and well-being and make sure all welfare requirements are met. All staff know the routes to follow if they have any safeguarding concerns.
  • Engagement with parents is very good. Parents are welcomed and involved at the start of the day and provided with good advice to support their children’s learning at home. They told inspectors that they are impressed with the ‘calm and welcoming atmosphere’ and the ‘purposeful activities that capture children’s interest’.
  • Adults assess children’s communication and language needs very thoroughly and adapt teaching and activities well to meet their needs. However, children’s mathematical skills, their knowledge and understanding of the world and their social needs are not assessed as effectively. Sometimes, children’s lack of English masks their ability in other areas. Consequently, some of the activities provided, particularly those designed to promote mathematical skills, are not sufficiently challenging for the most able children.

School details

Unique reference number Local authority Inspection number 105491 Manchester 10025642 This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act. Type of school Primary School category Age range of pupils Gender of pupils Voluntary controlled 3 to 11 Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 429 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Executive headteacher Telephone number Website Email address Lesley Gutteridge Gareth Elswood 0161 273 3621 www.st-chrysostoms.manchester.sch.uk admin@st-chrysostoms.manchester.sch.uk Date of previous inspection 3–4 November 2011

Information about this school

  • The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website.
  • The school is larger than the average-sized primary school. The number on roll has increased significantly since the last inspection.
  • A much larger than average proportion of pupils join or leave the school at times other than the start of the Reception Year. Some pupils stay only a short time while their families find a more permanent address.
  • The vast majority of pupils are from minority ethnic groups. A much larger than average proportion speak English as an additional language and many pupils join the school at early stages of English-language acquisition. Over 20 languages are spoken.
  • The proportion of disadvantaged pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium is well-above average.
  • The proportion of pupils who receive support for special educational needs and/or disabilities is well-above average. The proportion with a statement of special educational needs or education, health and care plan is average.
  • The school meets the 2015 floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics.
  • The school has experienced instability in leadership, with a number of interim appointments, and has an almost entirely different teaching staff since the last inspection.

Information about this inspection

  • Inspectors observed teaching in each class. They talked to pupils about their learning and listened to pupils read.
  • Inspectors scrutinised a sample of pupils’ work from each class from Year 1 to Year 6. They evaluated pupils’ progress and standards in writing, mathematics, science and foundation subjects.
  • Inspectors observed pupils around the school and at breaktimes and lunchtimes. They spoke to a number of pupils informally and had meetings with three groups of pupils.
  • A wide range of documentation was considered, including the school’s self-evaluation, improvement planning, policies, safeguarding procedures and monitoring by the local authority.
  • Inspectors met with senior leaders, middle leaders and teachers, two governors and a representative of the local authority.
  • Inspectors took account of 28 responses to Parent View and spoke with many more parents at the start of the school day.

Inspection team

Jean Olsson-Law, lead inspector John Shutt Moira Atkins Clare McGarey Sheryl Farnworth

Her Majesty’s Inspector Ofsted Inspector Ofsted Inspector Ofsted Inspector Ofsted Inspector